mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpuacct: VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING don't prevent percpu cputime count
Date: Sat,  9 May 2009 18:26:08 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090509182541.8D0F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090507105007.GA28398@elte.hu>

> 
> * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Changelog:
> >   since v2
> >   - revert using percpu_counter_sum()
> > 
> >   since v1
> >   - use percpu_counter_sum() instead percpu_counter_read()
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] cpuacct: VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING don't prevent percpu cputime count
> > 
> > cpuacct_update_stats() is called at every tick updating. and it use percpu_counter
> > for avoiding performance degression.
> > 
> > For archs which define VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING, every tick would result
> > in >1000 units of cputime updates and since this is much much greater
> > than percpu_batch_counter, we end up taking spinlock on every tick.
> > 
> > This patch change batch rule. now, any cpu can store "percpu_counter_bach * jiffies"
> > cputime in per-cpu cache.
> > it mean this patch don't have behavior change if VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=n.
> > 
> > Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched.c |    6 +++++-
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Index: b/kernel/sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/kernel/sched.c	2009-04-30 11:37:47.000000000 +0900
> > +++ b/kernel/sched.c	2009-05-07 16:34:00.000000000 +0900
> > @@ -10221,6 +10221,7 @@ struct cpuacct {
> >  };
> >  
> >  struct cgroup_subsys cpuacct_subsys;
> > +static s32 cpuacct_batch;
> 
> should be __read_mostly i guess.
> 
> >  
> >  /* return cpu accounting group corresponding to this container */
> >  static inline struct cpuacct *cgroup_ca(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> > @@ -10250,6 +10251,9 @@ static struct cgroup_subsys_state *cpuac
> >  	if (!ca->cpuusage)
> >  		goto out_free_ca;
> >  
> > +	if (!cpuacct_batch)
> > +		cpuacct_batch = jiffies_to_cputime(percpu_counter_batch);
> 
> So this is a once per boot condition? Why not initialize it in 
> sched_init() or so? (instead of incuring this ugly check all the 
> time)

Thanks! fixed.



Changelog:
  since V3
  - rewirte patch description (thanks Bharata!)
  - append read_mostly to cpuacct_batch
  - cpuacct_batch is initialized by sched_init()

  since v2
  - revert using percpu_counter_sum()

  since v1
  - use percpu_counter_sum() instead percpu_counter_read()


---------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [PATCH v4] cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter batch values for stats counters on archs that have VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y

percpu counters used to accumulate statistics in cpuacct controller use
the default batch value [max(2*nr_cpus, 32)] which can be too small for
archs that define VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING. In such archs, a tick could result in
cputime updates in the range of thousands. As a result, cpuacct_update_stats()
would end up acquiring the percpu counter spinlock on every tick which
is not good for performance.

Let those architectures to have a bigger batch threshold so that percpu counter
spinlock isn't taken on every tick. This change doesn't affect the archs which
don't define VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING and they continue to have the default
percpu counter batch value.

Cc: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/sched.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: b/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/sched.c	2009-05-09 16:48:08.000000000 +0900
+++ b/kernel/sched.c	2009-05-09 18:16:00.000000000 +0900
@@ -824,8 +824,12 @@ static struct file_operations sched_feat
 	.release	= single_release,
 };
 
+static __read_mostly s32 cpuacct_batch;
+
 static __init int sched_init_debug(void)
 {
+	cpuacct_batch = jiffies_to_cputime(percpu_counter_batch);
+
 	debugfs_create_file("sched_features", 0644, NULL, NULL,
 			&sched_feat_fops);
 
@@ -10457,7 +10461,8 @@ static void cpuacct_update_stats(struct 
 	ca = task_ca(tsk);
 
 	do {
-		percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val);
+		__percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val, cpuacct_batch);
+
 		ca = ca->parent;
 	} while (ca);
 	rcu_read_unlock();



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-09  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-07  9:59 KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-07 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-09  9:26   ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-05-09  9:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-09  9:52       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-09 10:14         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-11 12:33           ` [tip:sched/core] sched: cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter batch values for stats counters tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-11 12:36           ` tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-11 15:07             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 10:01               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 10:02                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-12 10:06                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 10:22                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 10:27                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 10:42                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 10:10                 ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-12 10:13                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 10:24                     ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-12 10:29                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 10:44                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 13:28                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 13:40                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 13:42                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-16  8:10                           ` Bharata B Rao
2009-07-16  8:39                             ` Anton Blanchard
2009-08-20  5:10                               ` Anton Blanchard
2009-08-20  5:16                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20  5:26                                 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-20  5:52                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-20  6:05                                     ` Anton Blanchard
2009-08-20  6:10                                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20  6:24                                         ` Anton Blanchard
2009-08-20  8:41                                           ` [PATCH] better align percpu counter (Was " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20 10:04                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-21  2:20                                               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-21 11:29                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-21  3:56                                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20 11:46                                           ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-21  6:21                                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-18  4:41                                 ` [PATCH] " Anton Blanchard
2010-01-18  4:55                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-18  7:51                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18  8:21                                     ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-18  8:34                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18  8:35                                   ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-18  9:42                                   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-18  9:55                                     ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-18 11:00                                       ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-21 15:25                                       ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-21 15:36                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-25 23:14                                   ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-25 23:44                                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-26  6:17                                     ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-26  6:35                                       ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-26  8:07                                         ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-27 13:15                                   ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Anton Blanchard
2010-01-27 13:34                                     ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-27 21:22                                       ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-27 21:43                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-28 12:48                                           ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu_counter: Make __percpu_counter_add an inline function on UP Anton Blanchard
2010-01-28 12:52                                             ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter batch values for stats counters Anton Blanchard
2010-01-28  5:21                                         ` [tip:sched/urgent] " Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090509182541.8D0F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=balajirrao@gmail.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®