From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpuacct: VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING don't prevent percpu cputime count
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:26:08 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090509182541.8D0F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090507105007.GA28398@elte.hu>
>
> * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Changelog:
> > since v2
> > - revert using percpu_counter_sum()
> >
> > since v1
> > - use percpu_counter_sum() instead percpu_counter_read()
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] cpuacct: VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING don't prevent percpu cputime count
> >
> > cpuacct_update_stats() is called at every tick updating. and it use percpu_counter
> > for avoiding performance degression.
> >
> > For archs which define VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING, every tick would result
> > in >1000 units of cputime updates and since this is much much greater
> > than percpu_batch_counter, we end up taking spinlock on every tick.
> >
> > This patch change batch rule. now, any cpu can store "percpu_counter_bach * jiffies"
> > cputime in per-cpu cache.
> > it mean this patch don't have behavior change if VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=n.
> >
> > Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: b/kernel/sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/kernel/sched.c 2009-04-30 11:37:47.000000000 +0900
> > +++ b/kernel/sched.c 2009-05-07 16:34:00.000000000 +0900
> > @@ -10221,6 +10221,7 @@ struct cpuacct {
> > };
> >
> > struct cgroup_subsys cpuacct_subsys;
> > +static s32 cpuacct_batch;
>
> should be __read_mostly i guess.
>
> >
> > /* return cpu accounting group corresponding to this container */
> > static inline struct cpuacct *cgroup_ca(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> > @@ -10250,6 +10251,9 @@ static struct cgroup_subsys_state *cpuac
> > if (!ca->cpuusage)
> > goto out_free_ca;
> >
> > + if (!cpuacct_batch)
> > + cpuacct_batch = jiffies_to_cputime(percpu_counter_batch);
>
> So this is a once per boot condition? Why not initialize it in
> sched_init() or so? (instead of incuring this ugly check all the
> time)
Thanks! fixed.
Changelog:
since V3
- rewirte patch description (thanks Bharata!)
- append read_mostly to cpuacct_batch
- cpuacct_batch is initialized by sched_init()
since v2
- revert using percpu_counter_sum()
since v1
- use percpu_counter_sum() instead percpu_counter_read()
---------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [PATCH v4] cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter batch values for stats counters on archs that have VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y
percpu counters used to accumulate statistics in cpuacct controller use
the default batch value [max(2*nr_cpus, 32)] which can be too small for
archs that define VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING. In such archs, a tick could result in
cputime updates in the range of thousands. As a result, cpuacct_update_stats()
would end up acquiring the percpu counter spinlock on every tick which
is not good for performance.
Let those architectures to have a bigger batch threshold so that percpu counter
spinlock isn't taken on every tick. This change doesn't affect the archs which
don't define VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING and they continue to have the default
percpu counter batch value.
Cc: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: b/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/sched.c 2009-05-09 16:48:08.000000000 +0900
+++ b/kernel/sched.c 2009-05-09 18:16:00.000000000 +0900
@@ -824,8 +824,12 @@ static struct file_operations sched_feat
.release = single_release,
};
+static __read_mostly s32 cpuacct_batch;
+
static __init int sched_init_debug(void)
{
+ cpuacct_batch = jiffies_to_cputime(percpu_counter_batch);
+
debugfs_create_file("sched_features", 0644, NULL, NULL,
&sched_feat_fops);
@@ -10457,7 +10461,8 @@ static void cpuacct_update_stats(struct
ca = task_ca(tsk);
do {
- percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val);
+ __percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val, cpuacct_batch);
+
ca = ca->parent;
} while (ca);
rcu_read_unlock();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-09 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-07 9:59 KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-07 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-09 9:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-05-09 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-09 9:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-09 10:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-11 12:33 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter batch values for stats counters tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-11 12:36 ` tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-11 15:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 10:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-12 10:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 10:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 10:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 10:10 ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-12 10:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 10:24 ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-12 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 10:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 13:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 13:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-12 13:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-16 8:10 ` Bharata B Rao
2009-07-16 8:39 ` Anton Blanchard
2009-08-20 5:10 ` Anton Blanchard
2009-08-20 5:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20 5:26 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-20 5:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-20 6:05 ` Anton Blanchard
2009-08-20 6:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20 6:24 ` Anton Blanchard
2009-08-20 8:41 ` [PATCH] better align percpu counter (Was " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20 10:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-21 2:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-21 11:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-21 3:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20 11:46 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-21 6:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-18 4:41 ` [PATCH] " Anton Blanchard
2010-01-18 4:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-18 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 8:21 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-18 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 8:35 ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-18 9:42 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-18 9:55 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-18 11:00 ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-21 15:25 ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-21 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-25 23:14 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-25 23:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-26 6:17 ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-26 6:35 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-26 8:07 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-27 13:15 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Anton Blanchard
2010-01-27 13:34 ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-27 21:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-27 21:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-28 12:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu_counter: Make __percpu_counter_add an inline function on UP Anton Blanchard
2010-01-28 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter batch values for stats counters Anton Blanchard
2010-01-28 5:21 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090509182541.8D0F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balajirrao@gmail.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®