From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758589AbZEKMSW (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 08:18:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756828AbZEKMRO (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 08:17:14 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:51557 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758072AbZEKMRN (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 08:17:13 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 07:38:40 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: trekker.dk@centrum.cz Cc: tuxonice-devel@lists.tuxonice.net, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce Message-ID: <20090510053840.GG1363@ucw.cz> References: <1241620755-22133-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> <20090507120948.GA1531@ucw.cz> <200905080037.19722@centrum.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905080037.19722@centrum.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 2009-05-08 00:37:39, trekker.dk@centrum.cz wrote: > Well... > > > > > > >To summarise disadvantages: > > > >- only core has 8000 LoC > >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace > > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace). > >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality. > >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing > > > > To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works. > (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.) > Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html