From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756039AbZEJVWj (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 17:22:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752623AbZEJVW3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 17:22:29 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:52015 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752504AbZEJVW3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 17:22:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:22:23 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Joe Perches Cc: Andrew Morton , Sam Ravnborg , randy.dunlap@oracle.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: MAINTAINER email address style? Message-ID: <20090510212223.GA30393@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20090417134711.ba0f03e7.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <1240003652.31116.44.camel@localhost> <20090407081312.GH1408@ucw.cz> <1240415689.21848.19.camel@localhost> <20090422185916.GA3864@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20090422120510.cc17e470.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1240430185.21848.103.camel@localhost> <20090422203005.GA467@elf.ucw.cz> <1240557233.6735.240.camel@localhost> <1241987200.3877.9.camel@Joe-AcerAspire> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1241987200.3877.9.camel@Joe-AcerAspire> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > If possible, it would be nice to aggregate multiple entries onto one > > > line. I.e.: > > > P: Len Brown > > > M: len.brown@intel.com > > > P: Pavel Machek > > > M: pavel@ucw.cz > > > P: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > M: rjw@sisk.pl > > > L: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org > > > S: Supported > > > > > > -> > > > > > > P: Len Brown now , Pavel Machek , Rafael J. Wysocki > > > L: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org > > > S: Supported > > Is there a consensus/majority opinion on this? > > Should names and email addresses in MAINTAINERS be integrated? > Should it stay as-is or be changed to: > > M: name > M: name2 > > or > > M: name , name2 I'd prefer this... add addresses until 80 characters are full, then start new line. > When multiple names are on a single line, > the M: line length can get relatively long. > > The longest lines are 240 chars long. Yep, that looks bad. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html