mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC][git-pull -tip] x86: cpu_debug and cpufeature patches
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:07:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090511140754.GB6175@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241894177.8978.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>


* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 15:27 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 11:09 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > We can use cpu_has tests for unknown processors but 'cpu model' is 
> > > > accurate and cover all range.
> > > > 
> > > > cpu_has does not cover following registers:
> > > > 1. platform
> > > > 2. poweron
> > > > 3. control
> > > > 4. bios
> > > > 5. freq
> > > > 6. cache
> > > > 7. misc
> > > > 8. base
> > > > 9. ver
> > > > 10. conf
> > > 
> > > Firstly these should be added to cpufeatures.h.
> > > 
> > > Then add cpu_has_xxx() accessors need to be added for them and 
> > > during CPU init they have to be properly set, via two methods:
> > > 
> > >  - via CPUID (where this is possible+specified in docs)
> > >  - or via "later than CPU version X" checks
> > > 
> > > Your cpu-model table is equivalent to an explicitly enumerated CPU 
> > > version check, but this breaks every time a new CPU comes out. 
> > > 
> > > "Later than" or CPUID based feature bits are a lot more future-proof 
> > > - we only have to add support for new _features_ (and quirks, 
> > > occasionally), and dont have to maintain that full table of specific 
> > > models to specific features mapping tables.
> > > 
> > 
> > I add some cpufeatures for review, I am still adding rest of them.
> > 
> > The following changes since commit c861b6f8ea9b39699f4a35bbf7dc06eb937a34de:
> >   Ingo Molnar (1):
> >         Merge branch 'irq/urgent'
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip.git master
> 
> 
> I added some more patches for the review.
> 
> The following changes since commit c861b6f8ea9b39699f4a35bbf7dc06eb937a34de:
>   Ingo Molnar (1):
>         Merge branch 'irq/urgent'
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip.git master
> 
> Jaswinder Singh Rajput (17):
>       x86: cpu_debug.c avoid storing cpu_descriptors locally
>       x86: cpu_debug update Kconfig entry
>       x86: cpu_debug.c remove unwanted header files
>       x86: Add cpufeature for Processor Name
>       x86: Add cpufeatures for Advanced Power Management
>       x86: Add cpufeature for Microcode update
>       x86: Add cpufeature for Cache MSRs
>       x86: Add cpufeature for Hard and Soft Poweron configuration
>       x86: Add cpufeature for Scaleable bus speed
>       x86: Add cpufeature for Miscellaneous Features
>       x86: Add cpufeature for Platform feature
>       x86: Add cpufeature for Hardware configuration
>       x86: Add cpufeature for System configuration
>       x86: Add cpufeature for System management mode (SMM)
>       x86: Add cpufeature for MM configuration
>       x86: Add cpufeature for Bus configuration
>       x86: cpu_debug replace cpu_modelflag with cpu_has
> 
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                  |   11 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_debug.h  |  169 +-----------
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h |   33 ++-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h  |    1 -
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile      |    2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c         |   33 ++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c      |   17 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c   |  542 ++++++++++++-------------------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c       |   93 ++++++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/powerflags.c  |   20 --
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c        |   14 -
>  arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c   |    3 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c |    3 +
>  13 files changed, 339 insertions(+), 602 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/powerflags.c

ok, this removes a ton of code, so it's a big step forward.

Logistics-wise, it would be nice to separate out the CPU features 
bits, and submit them in a separate thread, right now. Please base 
that branch on the latest version of tip:x86/cpufeature.

That is where most of the discussion/tweaking will be. The 
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c bits then will be obvious cleanups 
and obvious enhancements.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-11 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-20  1:15 [git-pull -tip] x86: cpu_debug patches Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-20  1:35 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-20  8:50   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-20 11:16     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-28 15:43       ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-28 17:28         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29  3:52           ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-29 10:50             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 12:14               ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-29 12:30                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-03  9:09                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06  9:57                   ` [RFC][git-pull -tip] x86: cpu_debug and cpufeature patches Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-06 12:25                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 12:49                       ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-08  0:39                     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-09 18:36                     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 14:07                       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-05-19 11:57                   ` [git-pull -tip] x86: cpu_debug patches Jaswinder Singh Rajput

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090511140754.GB6175@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®