From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000: "eeprom checksum is not valid" after kexec
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:31:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905111731.25043.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905111724.12606.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Monday 11 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday 11 May 2009, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 04/24/2009 06:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > My understanding is that the commit pointed to by Jiri caused a problem
> > > if the current mainline kernel was kexeced from an older kernel (2.6.27.x from
> > > openSUSE-11.1 in this particular case), because the older kernel didn't
> > > have the recent network driver fixes applied. Is this correct?
> >
> > Exactly!
> >
> > > Also, I'm still interested in whether or not removig the following three lines:
> > >
> > > /* Check if we're already there */
> > > if (dev->current_state == state)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > from pci_set_power_state() in the current mainline kernel fixes the problem
> > > in the configuration where it is readily reproducible.
> >
> > After removing those lines, the problem still persists:
> > e1000: 0000:02:01.0: e1000_probe: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid
>
> So it's more complicated than I thought. Well ...
>
> What if the driver in question is rmmoded before kexec?
Well, it should be the same, never mind.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-11 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-23 13:36 Jiri Slaby
2009-04-23 14:10 ` [E1000-devel] " Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-04-23 14:30 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-04-23 14:41 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-04-23 20:40 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-04-23 21:17 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-04-24 16:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-11 14:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-05-11 15:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-11 15:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-04-23 15:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-23 15:36 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-04-23 21:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200905111731.25043.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=cascardo@holoscopio.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®