From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754063AbZELUIf (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2009 16:08:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751973AbZELUIY (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2009 16:08:24 -0400 Received: from blaine.gmane.org ([80.91.229.8]:58997 "EHLO hugh.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751454AbZELUIX (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2009 16:08:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 19:46:31 +0200 From: Evgeni Golov To: Justin Mattock Cc: Jiri Slaby , Justin Mattock , Linux Kernel Mailing List , public-ath9k-devel-xDcbHBWguxHbcTqmT+pZeQ@hugh.gmane.org, public-linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@hugh.gmane.org Subject: Re: ath9k seems to be broken on 2.6.30-rc4 with a macbook pro In-Reply-To: References: <4A089E49.7080403@gmail.com> <20090512103905.0D68E1FD10@chi.die-welt.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__12_May_2009_19_46_31_+0200_uGTH6y+TQGxqsURk" Message-Id: <20090512174636.8EBDA1FD10@chi.die-welt.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Tue__12_May_2009_19_46_31_+0200_uGTH6y+TQGxqsURk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 12 May 2009 07:28:04 -0700 Justin Mattock wrote: > > Same here with 2.6.30-rc4, b43 and either Cisco (MAC-Addr starts with > > 00:40:96) or HP ProCurve (??? - they do WiFi? - MAC-Addr starts with > > 00:1F:FE) APs. No encryption, quite noisy environment (University). > > > > No problem with ipw2200 (actually 2915) in the same hardware (Thinkpad > > X31). Neither with the b43 and a standard Linksys WRT54GL (in the same! > > noisy university-env). > > > > Regards > > Evgeni > > > > >=20 > are you able to connect? > (or is the connection connecting but really > poor quality?) > over here 2.6.29-rc8 connects like > theirs no tomorrow, as soon as > I throw in 2.6.30-rc4 it just dead(although > on some accounts I did get some kind of > reaction, but not much, just what I see in dmesg). 2.6.29: fairly stable, even if not as good as with an intel card. 2.6.30-rc4: tons of timeouts, may connect 1 in 100 tries, connection will drop after some (short) time. --=20 Bruce Schneier Fact Number 79: Bruce Schneier once decrypted a box of AlphaBits. --Signature=_Tue__12_May_2009_19_46_31_+0200_uGTH6y+TQGxqsURk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoJtfcACgkQJKAUGKwVtQxZawCfcxexHk55eXn/JNxOemhyyX13 f18AnAm14ZXwmzLDRIP8CfQQpRCbbYbc =AglB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__12_May_2009_19_46_31_+0200_uGTH6y+TQGxqsURk--