From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756800AbZENN4Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 09:56:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753348AbZENN4N (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 09:56:13 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:42307 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753221AbZENN4N (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 09:56:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:01:38 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: Harvey Harrison , Andi Kleen , Tobias Doerffel , LKML Subject: Re: Specific support for Intel Atom architecture Message-ID: <20090514140138.GB10933@one.firstfloor.org> References: <200904301408.09370.tobias.doerffel@gmail.com> <877i0xib7d.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20090512150408.GH19296@one.firstfloor.org> <1242277453.23058.35.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:38:48AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Harvey Harrison > wrote: > > It's called be16_to_cpup, or on x86, swab16p() > > Indeed. If now somebody with an Atom could test whether using movbe > has an advantage (my guess is that there is a slight advantage) then How would you test that? -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.