From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759294AbZERJu5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 05:50:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757387AbZERJno (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 05:43:44 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]:22531 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758756AbZERJnm (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 05:43:42 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ONB+NJNgZABQ8QB9WXrF9n1Lqy9eGLhggVyQWPQZyk2B5jieNg1YYDQDsfklXkwagy Yo6ozn0kicCkJKl3LVU0qCuz/tqJcGctLFZkKPLFfUt4nD/rH4tstqkz/Bg6BpPhtJw7 DLBaxUgswWpd4a8l5didqiBvaKG+ji9vi2qcc= Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:45:01 +0800 From: Amerigo Wang To: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang Cc: Renzo Davoli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Roland McGrath , akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ptrace_vm: ptrace for syscall emulation virtual machines Message-ID: <20090518094501.GB13776@cr0.nay.redhat.com> References: <20090316074520.GC3360@hack> <20090324234753.GH22695@cs.unibo.it> <20090329163228.GE7671@hack> <20090404101708.GG4203@cs.unibo.it> <20090407173646.GL12226@hack> <20090408121851.GE24173@cs.unibo.it> <20090413163603.GG2391@hack> <20090417081823.GA31897@hack> <20090425091928.GB18153@cs.unibo.it> <20090430082711.GA24819@hack> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20090430082711.GA24819@hack> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:27:11PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote: >On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:19:28AM +0200, Renzo Davoli wrote: > >> >>I have successfully tested my paches in various configurations: >>- patched-kernel running patched-UML >>- patched-kernel running unpatched-UML >>- patched-kernel running umview >>- patched-UML running umview >>- UML on UML fails in the same way with and without the patch. >>I am currently running the patched kernel on my laptop. > >Thanks, I will give them another testing soon... Sorry for the long delay... I reviewed the whole patch set again, and tested it on both i386 and x86_64, it looks very fine!! :-) So I would like to see these patches to be merged. Andrew, could you please take these two patches for us?? Thank you!