From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752168AbZERI3n (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 04:29:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751466AbZERI33 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 04:29:29 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:61438 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750768AbZERI32 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 04:29:28 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: add a dma-mapping.h file Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:28:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Jeff Garzik , Robert Hancock , Tejun Heo , FUJITA Tomonori , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, flar@allandria.com, schmitz@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, takata@linux-m32r.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp References: <20090513043409.GA13577@cynthia.pants.nu> <200905172245.23774.arnd@arndb.de> <10f740e80905172303n4ef3cfc2j9922e19c281d471b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <10f740e80905172303n4ef3cfc2j9922e19c281d471b@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905181028.01914.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18hgXsQxAgPyB7uqCm9GbSch3K/rhuKD3Mv/kk Pav3N8IQgd2wYtmtu6ac0mG6YEwcopjCSA2MTgVgyIZ+vy77Yu 64mgvvSQq/BNJBBCeW7SQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 18 May 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > +#ifndef dma_alloc_coherent > > +static inline void * > > +dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle, > > +                  gfp_t flag) > > +{ > > +       void *virt = kmalloc(size, flag); > > kmalloc() may fail. > > > +       *dma_handle = virt_to_phys(virt); > > Not all variants of virt_to_phys() may handle the NULL case very well. > I took a statistically invalid sample: some just cast to unsigned > long, other subtract PAGE_OFFSET. Right. It should not really hurt, because all users need to check virt before using dma_handle, but I can fix it just to be sure. I'll wait for comments from Fujita Tomonori and others before I repost. Arnd <><