From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] perf_counter: optimize disable of time based sw counters
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:21:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090520102553.388185031@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090520102118.377477360@chello.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: perf_counter-opt-swcounter-disable-hrtimer.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]
Currently we call hrtimer_cancel() unconditionally on disable of time based
software counters. Avoid when possible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/perf_counter.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_counter.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -2716,7 +2716,8 @@ static int cpu_clock_perf_counter_enable
static void cpu_clock_perf_counter_disable(struct perf_counter *counter)
{
- hrtimer_cancel(&counter->hw.hrtimer);
+ if (counter->hw.irq_period)
+ hrtimer_cancel(&counter->hw.hrtimer);
cpu_clock_perf_counter_update(counter);
}
@@ -2767,7 +2768,8 @@ static int task_clock_perf_counter_enabl
static void task_clock_perf_counter_disable(struct perf_counter *counter)
{
- hrtimer_cancel(&counter->hw.hrtimer);
+ if (counter->hw.irq_period)
+ hrtimer_cancel(&counter->hw.hrtimer);
task_clock_perf_counter_update(counter, counter->ctx->time);
}
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-20 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-20 10:21 [PATCH 0/4] perf counter bits Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf_counter: solve the rotate_ctx vs inherit race differently Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 17:18 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: Solve " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 10:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf_counter: log irq_period changes Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 17:18 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: Log " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-05-20 17:19 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: Optimize disable of time based sw counters tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 10:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf_counter: optimize sched in/out of counters Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 17:19 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: Optimize " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 10:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] perf counter bits Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090520102553.388185031@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome