From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758232AbZEYBc0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 May 2009 21:32:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754047AbZEYBcT (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 May 2009 21:32:19 -0400 Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org ([213.95.27.120]:40212 "EHLO ganesha.gnumonks.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751405AbZEYBcS (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 May 2009 21:32:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:31:32 +0800 From: Harald Welte To: "Michael S. Zick" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: i2c-viapro / via-fb drivers on VIA CX700 Message-ID: <20090525013132.GA8702@prithivi.gnumonks.org> References: <200905221139.26941.lkml@morethan.org> <200905240727.30677.lkml@morethan.org> <4A198B24.9040404@zytor.com> <200905241332.39946.lkml@morethan.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905241332.39946.lkml@morethan.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 01:32:37PM -0500, Michael S. Zick wrote: > The i2c-viapro driver (in spite of its comments) does not work > on CX700 (written before manual was released) - it is reading > the serial number rather than the second data port. ;) > (No access to the chipset temperature/voltage data on SMBus). This is surprising. I just manually verified the driver against the cx700 programming manual, and it seems to do the right thing. Lacking access to a cx700 board right now, I cannot perform an actual test. Where exactly is the bug about the wrong register that you mentioned? I'd rather fix that ASAP. > The via-fb driver just "doesn't work" - Haven't looked at it yet. good to know. Seems like I need to get access to a CX700 based board. > There isn't a driver for the hardware watchdog on CX700 - JFYI: I wrote one but it doesn't work on the vx800/vx855, and VIA is currently trying to figure out why. > There isn't a driver for the machine error reporting - I think the CPU just claims to report it but in reality doesn't... this was made to make some proprietary software happy, AFAIR. -- - Harald Welte http://linux.via.com.tw/ ============================================================================ VIA Open Source Liaison