From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754765AbZEYWba (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 18:31:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752825AbZEYWbW (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 18:31:22 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f176.google.com ([209.85.219.176]:61570 "EHLO mail-ew0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751715AbZEYWbV (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 18:31:21 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=O4/FcUv8HcaB55VfqXeBaDtePP28qadoWlyFweA3LAXwCPBovsjJ3QL7JMRgZ0f+Vc 8k08RzeY+5jrmpMgW2DOMlCGVlWPq7ClwgHg6hTc1wezdGVwOLMLzZnlO1xZhsybWllP gsEa1fc8AKz3RIb81bgDtkObiaREAidGE3iRA= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: add warning about possible HPA compatibility issue Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 00:36:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.3 (Linux/2.6.30-rc6-next-20090522-05935-g4d19128; KDE/4.2.3; i686; ; ) Cc: Jeff Garzik , Jacob , Christopher Hogan , Robert Hancock , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200905252348.08970.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090525232014.7b6dd7bd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20090525232014.7b6dd7bd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905260036.17718.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 26 May 2009 00:20:14 Alan Cox wrote: > > +static inline void ata_hpa_warn(unsigned long long first_sector, > > + unsigned long long last_sector) > > +{ > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "*** possible compatibility issue:\n" > > + "*** sectors %llu-%llu may be inaccessible\n" > > + "*** if Host Protected Area is used for filesystem data\n" > > + "*** (please refer to \"ignore_hpa\" module parameter)\n", > > + first_sector, last_sector); > > +} > > NAK - this is extremely misleading and will just randomly terrify users, > who may then set the paramater and corrupt things like BIOS save areas. Please propose better description.