From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752605AbZFAIsb (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2009 04:48:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752882AbZFAIsV (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2009 04:48:21 -0400 Received: from jack.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.46]:41718 "EHLO jack.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754620AbZFAIsT (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2009 04:48:19 -0400 From: Tobias Doerffel To: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add specific support for Intel Atom architecture Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:48:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.90 (Linux/2.6.30-rc7; KDE/4.2.85; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1243638699-15194-1-git-send-email-tobias.doerffel@gmail.com> <87r5y4cqub.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> In-Reply-To: <87r5y4cqub.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1465409.HYaWQVMQMz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200906011048.18305.tobias.doerffel@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: --- Start der SpamAssassin 3.2.5 Textanalyse (-1.4 Punkte) Fragen an/questions to: Postmaster TU Chemnitz -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Nachricht wurde nur ueber vertrauenswuerdige Rechner weitergeleitet --- Ende der SpamAssassin Textanalyse X-Scan-Signature: cb5add96829c288e5da73fa3a8e2275c Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart1465409.HYaWQVMQMz Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Am Montag, 1. Juni 2009 10:15:24 schrieben Sie: > Tobias Doerffel writes: > > This adds another option when selecting CPU family so the kernel can > > be optimized for Intel Atom CPUs. If GCC supports tuning options for > > Intel Atom they will be used. > > You seem to have ignored the earlier review feedback? Actually not. Both of the issues (MODULE_PROC_FAMILY, mtune=3Dgeneric) were= =20 discussed but we didn't obtain a final agreement on them. So what do you (a= nd=20 others) suggest? Regards, Toby --nextPart1465409.HYaWQVMQMz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEUEABECAAYFAkojlccACgkQHsjdpw2OaaeClwCfS7fVTPoXBBAVoO3Nuo7h53dt txsAlRI5KR3n2zINVRlwOBmjc/O7gY0= =rrNF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1465409.HYaWQVMQMz--