From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754301AbZFCIzy (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:55:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752031AbZFCIzo (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:55:44 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:52362 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751985AbZFCIzn (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:55:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:55:47 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Greg KH , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Craig Shelley Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the ttydev tree Message-ID: <20090603095547.1641ca7b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20090603180734.f175e04f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090603180734.f175e04f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > As a side issue, the last patch has no SOB from Craig in the ttydev tree. Yes it does... Signed-off-by: Craig Shelley (Fixed some collisions merging) Signed-off-by: Alan Cox > So, I just used the ttydev tree version on the assumption that my > reasoning above is correct. and the ttydev tree one is the one to use