From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753852AbZFFHcJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2009 03:32:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753259AbZFFHbq (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2009 03:31:46 -0400 Received: from Cpsmtpm-eml107.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.11]:52377 "EHLO CPSMTPM-EML107.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752372AbZFFHbq (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2009 03:31:46 -0400 From: Frans Pop To: Pekka J Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pnp: add PNP resource range checking function Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:31:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apw@canonical.com, colin.king@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonicalc.com, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com References: In-reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906060931.36168.elendil@planet.nl> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jun 2009 07:31:46.0994 (UTC) FILETIME=[D91F4920:01C9E678] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Add a PNP resource range check function, indicating whether a resource > has been assigned to any device. Shouldn't this patch come *before* your patch 1/2? You now seem to use this function in a commit where it has not yet been defined, which could result in build errors during bisections. Cheers, FJP