From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752067AbZFHEzc (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:55:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750971AbZFHEzV (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:55:21 -0400 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:35660 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750711AbZFHEzT (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:55:19 -0400 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Wu Fengguang Subject: Re: sk_lock: inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, LKML , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20090608023757.GA6244@localhost> References: <20090608023757.GA6244@localhost> Message-Id: <20090608134428.4373.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:55:18 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi > Hi, > > This lockdep warning appears when doing stress memory tests over NFS. > > page reclaim => nfs_writepage => tcp_sendmsg => lock sk_lock > > tcp_close => lock sk_lock => tcp_send_fin => alloc_skb_fclone => page reclaim > > Any ideas? AFAIK, btrfs has re-dirty hack. ------------------------------------------------------------------ static int btrfs_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc) { struct extent_io_tree *tree; if (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) { redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page); unlock_page(page); return 0; } tree = &BTRFS_I(page->mapping->host)->io_tree; return extent_write_full_page(tree, page, btrfs_get_extent, wbc); } --------------------------------------------------------------- PF_MEMALLOC mean caller is try_to_free_pages(). (not normal write nor kswapd) Can't nfs does similar hack? I'm not net nor nfs expert. perhaps I'm wrong :-) Thanks.