From: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@cisco.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
arjan@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] initdev:kernel:Await block device discovery
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 16:13:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090608231305.GA28992@cuplxvomd02.corp.sa.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A2D96C5.2080604@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:55:01AM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> David VomLehn wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:04:38AM -0400, Stefan Richter wrote:
>>> 1.) It depends on the rootdelay so big that it is guaranteed that
>>> one or more initdev_found() have been called before
>>> prepare_namespace()'s ssleep(root_delay) is over.
> ...
>> I think you misunderstood. Buses are enumerated before this code is
>> reached and thus initdev_found() has already been called for all attached
>> block devices.
> ...
>> I would appreciate it if you could take a closer look at the locations where
>> initdev_found() and initdev_probe_done() are called and see if you still
>> think there is a problem.
>
> I obviously need to do that.
>
> However, one issue remains: If somebody wants to use your API for
> another bus, he needs to know at which point he can successfully use it,
> and after what point (or context) it cannot, even must not, be used
> anymore. This isn't documented --- or is it?
Hmm, I tried to make this clear in Documentation/driver-model/initdev.txt,
but I don't claim to be much of a writer and am open to suggestions.
> (By 'buses are enumerated before...' you surely mean only the buses for
> which you implemented this API usage already.)
Yes, definitely. In an ideal world, every bus which might have a console,
network, or block device would be using this API. USB is a big problem for
me, so that's the itch I scratched. Alan Stern also gave a rub to SCSI.
If people are using devices on, say, Firewire, they will have whatever
behavior they had before the introduction of the API.
> Stefan Richter
David VomLehn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-08 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-06 2:34 David VomLehn
2009-06-06 10:04 ` Stefan Richter
2009-06-08 22:30 ` David VomLehn
2009-06-08 22:55 ` Stefan Richter
2009-06-08 23:13 ` David VomLehn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090608231305.GA28992@cuplxvomd02.corp.sa.net \
--to=dvomlehn@cisco.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®