From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754564AbZFIOQh@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754564AbZFIOQh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:16:37 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752777AbZFIOQ2
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:16:28 -0400
Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:50083 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750998AbZFIOQ1 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:16:27 -0400
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:16:21 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@linux.intel.com>,
       Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter/x86: Correct some event and umask
	values for Intel processors
Message-ID: <20090609141621.GA32703@elte.hu>
References: <20090609131553.GA12489@ywang-moblin2.bj.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090609131553.GA12489@ywang-moblin2.bj.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.1
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.1 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5
	-1.1 BAYES_05               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5%
	[score: 0.0221]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Correct some event and UMASK values according to Intel SDM.

Very nice, thanks!

were you able to test the Atom ones by any chance?

	Ingo