Re: [patch 0/3] crypto: padlock-aes: enable on VIA Nano

[Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@viatech.com>]

Hi all,

On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 08:42:03PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Chuck Ebbert | 2009-06-09 10:35:33 [-0400]:
> 
> >The VIA Nano has a bug that makes the padlock unit fetch extra data
> >during encryption operations. Add workarounds for that, and enable
> >the driver on x86_64.
> Nice. The X86_64 padlock will make it mainline in next merge window so
> I'm asking you kindly to rebase it against Herbert's cryptodev tree [0].
> 
> I guess the bug can trigger on 32bit if you boot the affected 64bit CPU
> in 32bit mode? I'm not sure if it is better to send this patches via
> stable tree _or_ deactivate the padlock on affected CPUs.

I have now re-confirmed the errata with VIA/Centaur guys, and it seems correct.
Also, reviewing [but not testing] the patch, it looks correct to me.

The check for stepping '2' is also correct, as stepping 3 no longer has this
issue.

Chuck, I'd be more than thankful if you could rebase and resubmit as requested.
If not, please drop me a not so i can put it on my todo list.

Acked-by: HaraldWelte <HaraldWelte@viatech.com>
-- 
- Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@viatech.com>	    http://linux.via.com.tw/
============================================================================
VIA Free and Open Source Software Liaison