From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1762927AbZFKLLS@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1762927AbZFKLLS (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:11:18 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761240AbZFKLLJ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:11:09 -0400
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56701
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756953AbZFKLLI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:11:08 -0400
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20090611.041111.85388178.davem@davemloft.net>
To: linux@arm.linux.org.uk
Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, swetland@google.com,
       san@android.com, rlove@google.com
Subject: Re: HTC Dream aka. t-mobile g1 support
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090611110539.GJ795@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20090611.034421.180842375.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20090611.034732.147822760.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20090611110539.GJ795@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:05:39 +0100

> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 03:47:32AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> <rmk> in hind sight, xxxxxxx was effectively right when he said on here a while ago
>> <rmk> 22:34 <xxxxxx> jejb: google also just pretty much threw their ARM code over the wall and disappeared
 ...
> I'm sorry, that's the precise same channel and network which those
> comments were first made by the person who made them.
> 
> And now read precisely what I said rather than twisting it to your own
> agenda.

You're the one who can't read.

The words "was" and "when" were used, which indicate a point in time
(not only for the statement but also when it applies).

You didn't say "his comments back then actually do apply now".
But it may be convenient for you to portray things this way.

Russell, if you only knew how people speak of you in private....