From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759232AbZFKUei (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:34:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751065AbZFKUeb (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:34:31 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-26.bluehost.com ([69.89.17.191]:42711 "HELO outbound-mail-26.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751232AbZFKUea (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:34:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=sfXtddpYxsd8eteJt1RQB2LJAW1234B6kzNnKcVVkQ5zF0oB37lQW0YrndspwFn63vxEfJliKV/hJeSKPpAyc3izpYjAe5YBR8qdsSWPimxpQO3Z2Jh24I+VpOxt/iSO; Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:33:47 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes To: Andrew Morton Cc: Eric Anholt , penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, elendil@planet.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apw@canonical.com, colin.king@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonicalc.com, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pnp: add PNP resource range checking function Message-ID: <20090611133347.1e79b950@jbarnes-g45> In-Reply-To: <20090609150944.6ffa8038.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <200906060931.36168.elendil@planet.nl> <4A2A1AB6.9020808@cs.helsinki.fi> <1244508839.7564.0.camel@gaiman.anholt.net> <20090609150944.6ffa8038.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.28.251 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:09:44 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:53:59 -0700 > Eric Anholt wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 10:28 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > Hi Frans, > > > > > > Frans Pop wrote: > > > >> Add a PNP resource range check function, indicating whether a > > > >> resource has been assigned to any device. > > > > > > > > Shouldn't this patch come *before* your patch 1/2? > > > > You now seem to use this function in a commit where it has not > > > > yet been defined, which could result in build errors during > > > > bisections. > > > > > > Yes, correct. Sorry about that! > > > > > > Pekka > > > > This is already in drm-intel-next > > > > Neither patch is in linux-next. So either a) drm-intel-next contains > 2.6.31 material or b) your processes broke. drm-intel-next gets into linux-next by way of drm-next. Not sure if Dave has pulled Eric's bits yet though. > Either way, these patches fix a "serious performance regression". > They should be merged into 2.6.30 or 2.6.30.x, shouldn't they? I'm still a little nervous about this, but I won't block it. Since the commits don't have stable@kernel.org cc'd I guess Pekka will just have to send a note to stable when they go upstream. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center