From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1758131AbZFOIwX@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758131AbZFOIwX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:52:23 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757189AbZFOIv7
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:51:59 -0400
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:37362
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757450AbZFOIv6 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:51:58 -0400
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20090615.015201.25929512.davem@davemloft.net>
To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090615172640.32b1243b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20090615164022.9b06b579.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
	<20090615172640.32b1243b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:26:40 +1000

> OK, senility is definitely setting in! :-)  This is the same failure we
> had on Friday for which I sent a patch ...  Dave, can you apply that to
> the sparc tree?

Sorry, slipped through the cracks.  Could you please send me
a fresh copy of that patch?

Thanks!