From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: rientjes@google.com, jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ipv4: don't warn about skb ack allocation failures
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:08:40 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090617.160840.58571632.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A396EA2.60705@gmail.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:30:58 +0200
> My point is that 99% of callers know allocation failures are
> recoverable.
I agree that, surely for GFP_ATOMIC, warnings should be off
by default.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-17 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906161203160.27742@p34.internal.lan>
2009-06-16 16:06 ` 2.6.29.1: nfsd: page allocation failure - nfsd or kernel problem? Justin Piszcz
2009-06-16 20:19 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-06-17 8:43 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-06-17 9:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-06-17 10:39 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-06-17 18:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-06-17 20:24 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-06-17 20:39 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-18 8:54 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-06-18 17:07 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-18 17:56 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-06-18 18:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-06-18 18:15 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-17 22:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-06-18 0:14 ` Zdenek Kaspar
2009-06-17 19:44 ` [patch] ipv4: don't warn about skb ack allocation failures David Rientjes
2009-06-17 20:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-17 20:33 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-17 20:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-17 21:12 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-17 22:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-17 23:08 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-06-18 16:56 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-18 19:00 ` David Miller
2009-06-18 19:23 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-18 19:37 ` David Miller
2009-06-19 19:45 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-19 20:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19 22:37 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-19 23:04 ` David Miller
2009-06-20 1:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19 23:03 ` David Miller
2009-06-22 16:08 ` 2.6.30: nfsd: page allocation failure - nfsd or kernel problem? (again with 2.6.30) Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090617.160840.58571632.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®