mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Mayatskikh <vmayatsk@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] wait_task_zombie: do not use thread_group_cputime()
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:13:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090617101354.4100a910@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090615212651.GA22759@redhat.com>

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:26:51 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:

> There is no reason for thread_group_cputime() in wait_task_zombie(),
> there must be no other threads.
> 
> This call was previously needed to collect the per-cpu data which
> we do not have any longer.

Is similar change for posix_cpu_timers_exit_group() correct and worthwhile ?

 void posix_cpu_timers_exit_group(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-       struct task_cputime cputime;
+       struct signal_struct *const sig = tsk->signal;
 
-       thread_group_cputimer(tsk, &cputime);
        cleanup_timers(tsk->signal->cpu_timers,
-                      cputime.utime, cputime.stime, cputime.sum_exec_runtime);
+                      cputime_add(tsk->utime, sig->utime),
+                      cputime_add(tsk->stime, sig->stime),
+                      tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime + sig->sum_sched_runtime);
 }

Regards
Stanislaw

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-17  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-15 21:26 Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-16  0:47 ` Roland McGrath
2009-06-17  8:13 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2009-06-17 12:23   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090617101354.4100a910@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=vmayatsk@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®