From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Figo.zhang" <figo1802@gmail.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sumit Panchasara <sumit.panchasara@einfochips.com>,
"'Sachin P Sant'" <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"'H. Peter Anvin'" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"'Andi Kleen'" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"'Thomas Gleixner'" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]x86-tsc.c : fix compile warning
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:57:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090618072758.GI22013@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090617162303.GA10158@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> [2009-06-17 18:23:03]:
>
> * Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Ah, and you fixed in what a superior way: you improved the code in
> > > the process :-) This is how warnings should be fixed really.
> >
> > Hmm. Did you also see Pavel's reply to that patch [1]:
> > ! But that's a bug to be fixed, I'd say? ... actually I believe you are
> > ! introducing a bug here. Yes, old code would put random numbers in
> > ! loops_per_jiffy_ref for !CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS, but you are introducing
> > ! oops there.
> >
> > Was his comment incorrect?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > FJP
> >
> > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/24/159
>
> hm, Pavel seems right - i missed that. Subrata, mind sending an
> updated patch?
>
Hi, Ingo,
Yes, it does seem that we'll oops at *lpj, but to be honest the code
is badly written, ideally the CONFIG_SMP part should be abstracted
out, having that in a if loop makes reading it time consuming and
kills a few neuro cells each time.
--
Balbir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-18 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-17 13:57 Figo.zhang
[not found] ` <bb33bcf20906170700i4a4ea802yf1da08e9870d6221@mail.gmail.com>
2009-06-17 14:17 ` Subrata Modak
2009-06-17 14:20 ` Figo.zhang
2009-06-17 15:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-17 16:11 ` Subrata Modak
2009-06-17 16:12 ` Frans Pop
2009-06-17 16:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-17 16:55 ` Subrata Modak
2009-06-18 7:27 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2009-06-18 8:48 ` Subrata Modak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090618072758.GI22013@balbir.in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=figo1802@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sumit.panchasara@einfochips.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®