From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754450AbZFVH2k (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:28:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752278AbZFVH2a (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:28:30 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50934 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751002AbZFVH2a (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:28:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:28:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090622.002834.240476749.davem@davemloft.net> To: vishwakarma.deepak@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PF_RING for n/w traffic more than 1 Gbps From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Deepak Vishwakarma Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:50:11 +0530 > PF_RING kernel patch not optimized for traffic handling more than 1 > Gbps. I am facing packet overrun over 1 Gbps with linux 2.6.30 patched > with PF_RING. > > Does any one has achieved more than 2-3 Gbps packet handling with or > without PF_RING. You'll have more luck with this question on the networking developer list, netdev@vger.kernel.org, which has been CC:'d