From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH update 2] SCSI: explain the hidden scsi_wait_scan Kconfig variable
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:57:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090622095701.72c22150@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tkrat.da2728358fccf96e@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:03:23 +0200 (CEST)
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> People keep sending patches to expose CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN as a tunable
> item. These patches aren't accepted upstream, so let's stop the ongoing
> irritation of people due to the unconditionally installed module and its
> Kconfig symbol.
How about the other possibility. People keepmaking it tunable because it
makes sense for it to be tunable. Far better IMHO to make it tunable "if
EMBEDDED"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-22 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-17 2:07 [PATCH] scsi_wait_scan: no option appears when configuring for scsi_wait_scan Changli Gao
2009-06-17 2:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-06-17 10:07 ` [PATCH] SCSI: explain the hidden scsi_wait_scan Kconfig variable Stefan Richter
2009-06-17 10:28 ` Stefan Richter
2009-06-18 0:57 ` Changli Gao
2009-06-18 15:21 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-18 16:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-18 19:03 ` [PATCH update 1] " Stefan Richter
2009-06-18 19:03 ` [PATCH update 2] " Stefan Richter
2009-06-22 8:57 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2009-06-22 11:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090622095701.72c22150@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®