From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758400AbZFWLJw (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:09:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753810AbZFWLJf (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:09:35 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:54029 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754956AbZFWLJe (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:09:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:09:33 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel , akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: merging the per-bdi writeback patchset Message-ID: <20090623110933.GA16565@infradead.org> References: <20090623081156.GT31415@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090623081156.GT31415@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:11:56AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > Hi, > > Things are looking good for this patchset and it's been in -next for > almost a week without any reports of problems. So I'd like to merge it > for 2.6.31 if at all possible. Any objections? Last time we discussed this you said you're happy with 2.6.32. I really want to take a more detailed look and put that on the not so urgent list because ou didn't seem to rush for .31. So my vote goes for waiting a bit longer.