From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@googlemail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, htejun@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] ide: fix ide_kill_rq() for special ide-{floppy,tape} driver requests
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:44:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090624174411.GA5729@liondog.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090624.033909.147195176.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:39:09AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:09:53 +0200
>
> > The obscure reasons is just the fact that both ide-floppy and ide-tape
> > had a they own duplicated/buggy request completion routines.
> >
> > While they were being unified the whole bunch of similar class of bugs
> > were fixed so I agree that there may still be more issues to deal with
> > there.
>
> I see, the ->pc_callback() of these things set rq->errors and then
> ide_pc_intr() happily overrides whatever was set there, either on it's
> own or via ide_complete_rq().
>
> I'll look over this some more while I wait for the testing results
> from Borislav.
Ok, let's see now, I did some testing but can't seem to hit that
particular path because it is taken relatively rarely - it can be
reached from start_request() and ide_atapi_error() via ide_error for
ide-floppy and ide-tape.
If my code staring doesn't mislead me, the start_request()-one has to
happen during an IDE reset operation, while we're polling for reset
completion _and_ when drive->failures has reached drive->max_failures
since this is the only site the drive->failures counter is increased.
The ide_atapi_error() cannot happen because (!blk_fs_request(rq))
requests are being completed in ide_error() with the respective error
status.
It is possible that I've missed something so feel free to correct me
and/or suggest a different testing approach.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-24 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-23 21:26 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-23 23:16 ` David Miller
2009-06-24 0:49 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-24 7:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-06-24 6:49 ` David Miller
2009-06-24 10:09 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-24 10:39 ` David Miller
2009-06-24 17:44 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2009-06-25 10:09 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090624174411.GA5729@liondog.tnic \
--to=petkovbb@googlemail.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome