From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kmemleak false positive?
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:56:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090625145600.GA6654@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245921918.26218.19.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:25:17AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > kmemleak: backtrace:
> > kmemleak: [<c04fd8b3>] kmemleak_alloc+0x193/0x2b8
> > kmemleak: [<c04f5e73>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x11e/0x174
> > kmemleak: [<c0aae5a7>] debug_objects_mem_init+0x63/0x1d9
> > kmemleak: [<c0a86a62>] start_kernel+0x2da/0x38d
> > kmemleak: [<c0a86090>] i386_start_kernel+0x7f/0x98
> > kmemleak: [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> It could be a false positive. Do you get some "kmemleak: referenced"
> messages as well at a later time? In this case, it is just transient
> "leak", caused maybe by pointers stored on the stack or registers.
Yes, some time later.
> Is the obj_pool in lib/debugobjects.c supposed to be empty at the end of
> the test and all objects freed? The obj_pool is a list and the first
> elements in this list are from obj_static_pool, which is __initdata.
> Objects added to the list may be referred by chaining with the
> obj_static_pool objects but kmemleak doesn't scan __initdata as this is
> usually freed before kmemleak does its first scan. So, if it is just a
> transient "leak", kmemleak should later report "kmemleak: referenced" if
> a kmem_cache_free() is called on any of the reported objects.
Hmm, it's pretty noisy, and everything it's found so far looks to be
a false positive.
> You can mount debugfs on /sys/kerne/debug and read the kmemleak file in
> there (it triggers a new scan as well).
Currently prints the acpi traces I already posted.
> You can also echo stack=on to
> the above kmemleak file to enable kernel stack scanning.
>
> Could you send me your config options for DEBUG_OBJECTS_* and slab
> allocator so I can try to reproduce this?
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_SELFTEST is not set
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_FREE=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_ENABLE_DEFAULT=1
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-25 0:11 Dave Jones
2009-06-25 9:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-06-25 14:56 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2009-06-25 15:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-06-25 15:40 ` Dave Jones
2009-06-25 17:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-06-25 19:31 ` Dave Jones
2009-06-25 19:49 ` Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090625145600.GA6654@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®