From: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
Cc: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:15:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090629091508.GA6308@cr0.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5d9929e0906290153g305427c6j37f96db060cb4738@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:53:41AM +0100, Joao Correia wrote:
>Hello
>
>Well, it doesnt complain about MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES anymore, but
>now it gives me:
>
>BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
>turning off the locking correctness validator.
>Pid: 1672, comm: qemu-kvm Not tainted 2.6.30-wl #2
>Call Trace:
> [<c07da76f>] ? printk+0x22/0x3b
> [<c0463de9>] __lock_acquire+0xa77/0xb05
> [<c0463f2e>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
> [<c04be96c>] ? mm_take_all_locks+0xb3/0xf1
> [<c04be96c>] ? mm_take_all_locks+0xb3/0xf1
> [<c07dd476>] _spin_lock_nest_lock+0x30/0x71
> [<c04be96c>] ? mm_take_all_locks+0xb3/0xf1
> [<c04be96c>] mm_take_all_locks+0xb3/0xf1
> [<c04cc741>] do_mmu_notifier_register+0x9f/0x14e
> [<c04cc83d>] mmu_notifier_register+0x1e/0x31
> [<f9e461b8>] kvm_dev_ioctl+0xfd/0x25d [kvm]
> [<f9e460bb>] ? kvm_dev_ioctl+0x0/0x25d [kvm]
> [<c04e4df6>] vfs_ioctl+0x29/0x91
> [<c04e52f4>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x496/0x4e3
> [<c07dfb82>] ? do_page_fault+0x229/0x26a
> [<c0408e41>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xd
> [<c0461218>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x39/0x143
> [<c07dfb82>] ? do_page_fault+0x229/0x26a
> [<c04e5396>] sys_ioctl+0x55/0x86
> [<c04037f3>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
>
>which looks like its younger brother :-). (Also appears on other
>programs, not just qemu-kvm)
Hmmm.. also known. :)
>
>Should i increase its value too? Am i not just masking something else
>by doing this?
Just try to modify your sysctl.conf file, on Fedora it should be
/etc/sysctl.conf, try to double the value of
/proc/sys/kernel/max_lock_depth.
If this doesn't work, try to increase the value of 'max_lock_depth'
in the kernel source. :)
I think Peter will have a patch to fix this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-29 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-27 15:07 Joao Correia
2009-06-27 15:11 ` Joao Correia
2009-06-29 2:08 ` Américo Wang
2009-06-29 8:53 ` Joao Correia
2009-06-29 9:15 ` Amerigo Wang [this message]
2009-06-29 10:30 ` Joao Correia
2009-06-30 9:16 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-01 20:30 ` Joao Correia
2009-07-02 9:31 ` lockdep max numbers (was Re: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs) Amerigo Wang
2009-07-02 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-02 10:45 ` Joao Correia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090629091508.GA6308@cr0.nay.redhat.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome