From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] accessibility, speakup, speech synthesis & /sys
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:08:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090630130822.GR6405@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090630041833.GA13034@kroah.com>
Hello,
Greg KH, le Mon 29 Jun 2009 21:18:33 -0700, a écrit :
> > I believe there are two things:
> >
> > - per- harware speech synthesizer parameters (e.g. speed, pitch, etc.)
> > - screen reading parameters (e.g. characters pronunciation, key_echo,
> > current synthesizer being used etc.)
> >
> > Speech synthesizers should probably have their own device class, how
> > should it be called? "synth"? "speech"?
>
> Which do you think it should?
Speakup used to call them "synth", but anything else than speech could
be synthesized, so speech may be better.
> > Then there are the screen reading parameters. I'd tend to think that
> > like there are /sys/{block,firmware,fs,power}, there could be a
> > /sys/accessibility, or even shorter, /sys/a11y? Speakup parameters
> > could then be in /sys/a11y/speakup?
>
> Wouldn't these be on a "per-screen" basis?
Mmm, what do you call a screen? I guess you mean
/sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0? It would make sense indeed.
> So they would live under the screen reader device itself, not way up
> high in the device tree.
One problem is usability. That's something that users
will often want to tune, and /sys/a11y/speakup/key_echo is
definitely easier for the very common case of one head, than
/sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/reader/speakup/key_echo :)
> Actually, you are proposing them outside of the device tree, which I
> do not think you want at all.
It depends on what you call a "device". It's probably not obvious that
a screen reader is a device, but why not.
> What specific files are you thinking you would need?
There are a lot of them actually, like 20, tuning various aspects of
reading what happens on the console.
Samuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-30 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-25 22:04 Samuel Thibault
2009-06-30 4:18 ` Greg KH
2009-06-30 13:08 ` Samuel Thibault [this message]
2009-06-30 15:34 ` Greg KH
2009-06-30 20:01 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-06-30 6:34 ` Pavel Machek
2009-07-01 22:19 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-07-08 9:35 ` Pavel Machek
2009-07-08 9:42 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-07-12 10:31 ` Pavel Machek
2009-07-12 14:57 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-07-14 9:52 ` Pavel Machek
2009-07-14 12:44 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-07-19 21:27 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090630130822.GR6405@const.bordeaux.inria.fr \
--to=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®