From: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: extend pipe() to support NULL argument.
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:23:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090703102325.GK5880@cr0.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <412e6f7f0907030259m5556ee2fobbb58d377bce4d17@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 05:59:10PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Amerigo Wang<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>I said: It just a special case. Fixing sendfile() won't fix everything.
>>
>> What do you want? Just saving an fd, isn't it?
>>
>> sendfile() does this but you said it's buggy, if you fix it, what is the
>> rest problem?
>>
>You should know why Linux invented splice(2). Not all of the problems
>can be solved by sendfile(2).
Sure, it definitely can be seen from the interface....
>
>>>
>>>In fact, sendfile(2) is implemented via splice(2) infrastructure. The
>>>logic is the same, and much clever than yours. Dive into its code, you
>>>will find the reason why it must be blocked on outfd.
>>
>>
>> Sure, this is done in user-space, definitely....
>>
>Did you review the code of sendfile(2)?
Not at all.
I just wanted to show what I wanted to say, not to re-implement
sendfile(2).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-03 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-02 7:36 Changli Gao
2009-07-02 9:13 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-02 9:18 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-02 9:46 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-02 10:04 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-02 10:21 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-03 0:43 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-03 1:55 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-03 2:10 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-03 3:00 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-03 4:08 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-03 5:19 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-03 5:42 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-03 7:15 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-03 7:40 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-03 8:16 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-03 8:27 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-03 9:42 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-03 9:59 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-03 10:23 ` Amerigo Wang [this message]
2009-07-03 10:28 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2009-07-06 1:12 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-06 6:15 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2009-07-06 6:23 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-06 6:30 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2009-07-07 4:43 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-07-07 7:45 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-07 20:37 ` David Newall
2009-07-07 21:02 ` Zan Lynx
2009-07-08 4:41 ` Changli Gao
2009-07-08 4:43 ` David Newall
2009-07-02 10:42 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-03 0:45 ` Changli Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090703102325.GK5880@cr0.nay.redhat.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®