From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf tools: gitignore *.data
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:18:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090703131824.GB3207@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090703130936.GA5072@nowhere>
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:38:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > perf.data made by perf record is a data file and need to be
> > > ignored by git
> > >
> > > Added *.data so that perf.data and its friends will be ignored.
> >
> > > cscope*
> > > +*.data
> >
> > ok, this is something i wanted to revisit eventually - the
> > 'perf.data' name sucks a bit - as .data postfix is quite unspecific.
> >
> > Perhaps trace.perf is a better default name, and all files would
> > have the .perf postfix?
> >
> > I've Cc:-ed a number of folks who might have an opinion about this -
> > what would be the best default naming and postfix for perf binary
> > files?
> >
> > Ingo
>
> perf.bin seems to me adequate as it tells everything (IMHO).
hm, .bin is pretty overloaded as well. It also suggests a
'executable binary' in a certain way - which it isnt.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-03 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-03 6:39 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-03 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 13:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-03 13:18 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-07-03 14:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-03 6:32 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-03 6:40 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090703131824.GB3207@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®