From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Robin Getz <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
Cc: greg@kroah.com, "Jason Wessel" <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb_serial: only allow sysrq on a console port
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 19:17:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090705191751.6bbf594c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907051254.41964.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
> If Jason's patch is necessary () - should this be fixed up for standard
> UARTs too?
I think so yes, although I'd not realised it wasn't protected currently ?
>
> Make sure that only serial console (not _any_ serial port) responds to
> sysrq (or should something else be ensuring that this isn't set when
> the port !console? (I didn't see anything in serial_core.c?)
will check
> The above patch would sync the (seemlying duplicated) code between
> drivers/usb/serial/generic.c and include/linux/serial_core.h
There is a lot of near duplicate code like this. That is one reason for
adding struct tty_port. In theory both could be collapsed into
int tty_port_handle_sysrq(struct tty_port *port, unsigned int ch)
{
}
at this point as both USB and serial layer UARTs now have a port object.
That would just need port->sysrq collapsing into the tty_port.
port->console sort of already is.
> Greg?
>
> drivers/usb/serial/generic.c
> int usb_serial_handle_sysrq_char(struct usb_serial_port *port, unsigned int ch)
> {
> if (port->sysrq && port->console) {
> if (ch && time_before(jiffies, port->sysrq)) {
> handle_sysrq(ch, tty_port_tty_get(&port->port));
> port->sysrq = 0;
> return 1;
That also looks wrong - tty_port_tty_get takes a tty kref. I will check
that Monday and look at collapsing these int one as you note.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-05 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-29 18:34 [PATCH 0/2] more usb sysrq improvements Jason Wessel
2009-05-29 18:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] pl2303 usb_serial: implement sysrq handling on break Jason Wessel
2009-05-29 18:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb_serial: only allow sysrq on a console port Jason Wessel
2009-06-01 13:35 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-05 16:54 ` Robin Getz
2009-07-05 18:17 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2009-07-06 4:38 ` Robin Getz
2009-07-06 4:56 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-07-06 5:33 ` Robin Getz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090705191751.6bbf594c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®