From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755189AbZGGJkk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:40:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753750AbZGGJkd (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:40:33 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:36108 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753499AbZGGJkc (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:40:32 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , Wu Fengguang , Minchan Kim Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] fix unnecessary accidental OOM problem on concurrent reclaim Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com Message-Id: <20090707182947.0C6D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:40:31 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch series depent on "OOM analysis helper patches" series. Current reclaim logic doesn't consider concurrent reclaim. Then it makes accidental OOM on many CPU systems. I think this patch series addresses its issue.