From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755432AbZGPEiZ@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755432AbZGPEiZ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:38:25 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752677AbZGPEiY
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:38:24 -0400
Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:46669 "EHLO
	fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752665AbZGPEiX (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:38:23 -0400
X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Rename pgmoved variable in shrink_active_list()
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
       Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
       Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090715213516.9b47ad16.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20090716131928.9D25.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090715213516.9b47ad16.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Message-Id: <20090716133622.9D34.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja]
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:38:21 +0900 (JST)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:22:30 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > -#define __add_zone_page_state(__z, __i, __d)	\
> > -		__mod_zone_page_state(__z, __i, __d)
> > -#define __sub_zone_page_state(__z, __i, __d)	\
> > -		__mod_zone_page_state(__z, __i,-(__d))
> > -
> 
> yeah, whatever, I don't think they add a lot of value personally.
> 
> I guess they're a _bit_ clearer than doing __sub_zone_page_state() with
> a negated argument.  Shrug.

OK, I've catched your point.
I'll make all caller replacing patches.

Thanks.