From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752138AbZGTOcK (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:32:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751439AbZGTOcI (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:32:08 -0400 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:41543 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750850AbZGTOcI (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:32:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:30:48 +0900 (JST) X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Use add_page_to_lru_list() helper function Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <1248074911.15751.8023.camel@twins> References: <20090720143352.747E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <1248074911.15751.8023.camel@twins> Message-Id: <20090720231618.AF69.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 14:37 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > > @@ -1241,7 +1241,6 @@ static void move_active_pages_to_lru(str > > > > spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock); > > > > } > > > > } > > > > - __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_LRU_BASE + lru, pgmoved); > > > > if (!is_active_lru(lru)) > > > > __count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, pgmoved); > > > > } > > > > > > This is a net loss, you introduce pgmoved calls to __inc_zone_state, > > > instead of the one __mod_zone_page_state() call. > > > > max pgmoved is 32. 32 times __inc_zone_state() make 0 or 1 time > > atomic operation (not much than two). > > I don't think it reduce performance. > > its not just atomics, count calls and branches too. It simply adds a ton > of code for no particular reason. hm, I don't think it's tons penalty. I mean vmscan makes tons cache miss and function calling penalty is hidden by it. But, I agreed this patch doesn't have strong motivation. I can drop this. Andrew, Can you please drop this patch?