From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754924AbZGUGBS (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:01:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753311AbZGUGBS (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:01:18 -0400 Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:56180 "EHLO e9.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754515AbZGUGBR (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:01:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:31:14 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: Nikanth Karthikesan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] taskstats-fork: Add a new taskstats command to get notification on fork/clone Message-ID: <20090721060114.GS24157@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <200907211031.48294.knikanth@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200907211031.48294.knikanth@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Nikanth Karthikesan [2009-07-21 10:31:48]: > Add a new taskstats command to register for notification, whenever a new task > forks in the cpumask specified. > The changelog is sucky.. why do we need this? Why is proc-events not sufficient? -- Balbir