From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: "A, Raghu" <raghu.a@ti.com>
Cc: "pierre@ossman.eu" <pierre@ossman.eu>,
"dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net"
<dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Dasgupta, Romit" <romit@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Restoring back the system state from MMC after a successful hibernation
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:55:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090721185509.GA31923@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2A3DCF3DA181AD40BDE86A3150B27B6B02F1B9BF4C@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:35:55PM +0530, A, Raghu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying a hibernate-restore procedure on my system, wherein I store the context image on a swap partition on a MMC device (/dev/mmcblk0). The hibernation process happens smoothly. However, when I try to restore back, after including "resume = /dev/mmcblk0" in the bootargs, I find that the MMC card does not get detected by the time late_initcall(software_resume) is called, as a result of which the restore does not happen.
>
> To resolve the problem, I have included a mmc_flush_scheduled_work() call immediately after the mmc_detect_change(host, 0) call in mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host) function defined in linux/drivers/mmc/core/core.c, so that instead of mmc_rescan happening sometime later, it now happens right away, and the MMC card gets detected at the end of the host's .probe() callback itself.
>
> /*****
>
> void mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host)
>
> {
> mmc_power_off(host);
> mmc_detect_change(host, 0);
> mmc_flush_scheduled_work();
> }
>
> The host's probe() routine calls mmc_add_host , which in turn calls mmc_start_host.
>
> *****/
>
> Is this approach correct? Or is there any other way I can get the MMC card detected before late_initcall(software_resume) happens?
>
I think this is a good idea. Based on the comment for mmc_add_host(), by
the time we've exited mmc_add_host() the host should be ready to start
servicing requests, so mmc_start_host() really needs to have the
detected the card by the time it returns.
Perhaps it would be a good idea for mmc_detect_change() to grow another
argument that allows the detection to be synchronous?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-21 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 14:05 A, Raghu
2009-07-21 18:55 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090721185509.GA31923@console-pimps.org \
--to=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
--cc=raghu.a@ti.com \
--cc=romit@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®