From: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: fix set_binfmt() vs sys_delete_module() race
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:19:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090728071949.GD6036@cr0.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090724171943.GA10778@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 07:19:43PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>sys_delete_module() can set MODULE_STATE_GOING after search_binary_handler()
>does try_module_get(). In this case set_binfmt()->try_module_get() fails but
>since none of the callers check the returned error, the task will run with
>the wrong old ->binfmt.
>
>The proper fix should change all ->load_binary() methods, but we can rely
>on fact that the caller must hold a reference to binfmt->module and use
>__module_get() which never fails.
>
Sounds reasonable.
Would like to put the last words as comments into code below?
>Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>
>--- WAIT/include/linux/binfmts.h~SET_BINFMT 2009-05-03 17:15:27.000000000 +0200
>+++ WAIT/include/linux/binfmts.h 2009-07-24 19:02:19.000000000 +0200
>@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ extern int bprm_mm_init(struct linux_bin
> extern int copy_strings_kernel(int argc,char ** argv,struct linux_binprm *bprm);
> extern void install_exec_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
> extern void do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs *regs);
>-extern int set_binfmt(struct linux_binfmt *new);
>+extern void set_binfmt(struct linux_binfmt *new);
> extern void free_bprm(struct linux_binprm *);
>
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>--- WAIT/fs/exec.c~SET_BINFMT 2009-07-02 19:27:36.000000000 +0200
>+++ WAIT/fs/exec.c 2009-07-24 19:00:40.000000000 +0200
>@@ -1377,18 +1377,14 @@ out_ret:
> return retval;
> }
>
>-int set_binfmt(struct linux_binfmt *new)
>+void set_binfmt(struct linux_binfmt *new)
> {
>- struct linux_binfmt *old = current->binfmt;
>+ if (current->binfmt)
>+ module_put(current->binfmt->module);
>
>- if (new) {
>- if (!try_module_get(new->module))
>- return -1;
>- }
> current->binfmt = new;
>- if (old)
>- module_put(old->module);
>- return 0;
>+ if (new)
>+ __module_get(new->module);
I prefer to put the 'current->binfmt = new;' line as the last
statement within this function, since this is more readable for me.
> }
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_binfmt);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-28 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-24 17:19 Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-28 7:19 ` Amerigo Wang [this message]
2009-07-28 14:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-29 8:51 ` Amerigo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090728071949.GD6036@cr0.nay.redhat.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome