From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752139AbZHATTs (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:19:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752119AbZHATTr (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:19:47 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:35170 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752109AbZHATTh (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:19:37 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: Bug report (suspend to disk is broken in 2.6.29+ with EIDE drive) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 21:19:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.31-rc4-rjw; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Andrew Watts , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bzolnier@gmail.com, ide References: <937390.49428.qm@web111003.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4A748B27.3000902@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A748B27.3000902@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908012119.46522.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 01 August 2009, Robert Hancock wrote: > On 07/31/2009 12:22 AM, Andrew Watts wrote: > > Description: s2disk worked in 2.6.28 and no longer works in 2.6.30.2 > > (s2disk here means: echo disk> /sys/power/state); screen blanks but > > system hangs. > > > > Bisection reveals that the problem commit has hash: > > 295f00042aaf6b553b5f37348f89bab463d4a469. > > That would be: > > author Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:12:48 +0000 (16:12 +0100) > committer Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:12:48 +0000 (16:12 +0100) > commit 295f00042aaf6b553b5f37348f89bab463d4a469 > tree cbd56955f148f0e175d5b6b779c2888bf2645382 > parent ebdab07dad3d3a008e519b0a028e1e1ad5ecaef0 > > ide: don't execute the next queued command from the hard-IRQ context (v2) > > CCing Bart and linux-ide. Bart says that should be fixed by commit 2ea5521022ac8f4f528dcbae02668e02a3501a5a, which also is present in 2.6.29, so the bisection result is likely a false positive. Thanks, Rafael