From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@mail.by>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING at: drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 01:46:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090802224633.GA3200@localdomain.by> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908021423490.3352@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2406 bytes --]
On (08/02/09 14:33), Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > And another related point which I'm don't know is why we don't change
> > console_fops to hung_up_tty_fops in do_tty_hangup() in the below.
>
> Yup, you're right. Because console_fops has
>
> .write = redirected_tty_write,
>
> we won't actually hang up the console due to that test for "write !=
> tty_write".
[...]
> So exactly what _does_ happen if we get rid of that hack?
>
This solution looks like the right one. There is no trace
on shutdown.
I'll compile and test non-SMP kernel (and of course yet more testing for SMP).
Sergey
> drivers/char/tty_io.c | 19 +------------------
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_io.c b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
> index a3afa0c..80540ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
> @@ -496,10 +496,8 @@ static void do_tty_hangup(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct tty_struct *tty =
> container_of(work, struct tty_struct, hangup_work);
> - struct file *cons_filp = NULL;
> struct file *filp, *f = NULL;
> struct task_struct *p;
> - int closecount = 0, n;
> unsigned long flags;
> int refs = 0;
>
> @@ -520,11 +518,6 @@ static void do_tty_hangup(struct work_struct *work)
> file_list_lock();
> /* This breaks for file handles being sent over AF_UNIX sockets ? */
> list_for_each_entry(filp, &tty->tty_files, f_u.fu_list) {
> - if (filp->f_op->write == redirected_tty_write)
> - cons_filp = filp;
> - if (filp->f_op->write != tty_write)
> - continue;
> - closecount++;
> tty_fasync(-1, filp, 0); /* can't block */
> filp->f_op = &hung_up_tty_fops;
> }
> @@ -574,17 +567,7 @@ static void do_tty_hangup(struct work_struct *work)
> while (refs--)
> tty_kref_put(tty);
>
> - /*
> - * If one of the devices matches a console pointer, we
> - * cannot just call hangup() because that will cause
> - * tty->count and state->count to go out of sync.
> - * So we just call close() the right number of times.
> - */
> - if (cons_filp) {
> - if (tty->ops->close)
> - for (n = 0; n < closecount; n++)
> - tty->ops->close(tty, cons_filp);
> - } else if (tty->ops->hangup)
> + if (tty->ops->hangup)
> (tty->ops->hangup)(tty);
> /*
> * We don't want to have driver/ldisc interactions beyond
>
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 315 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-02 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-02 12:01 Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-02 16:05 ` Greg KH
2009-08-02 17:01 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-02 17:07 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-02 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-02 19:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-02 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-02 21:17 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-02 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-02 22:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2009-08-02 22:48 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-03 0:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 1:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 9:37 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-03 16:26 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-03 16:59 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 0/2] proper tty-ldisc refcounting (was Re: WARNING at: drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c) Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] tty-ldisc: make refcount be atomic_t 'users' count Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 18:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] tty-ldisc: turn ldisc user count into a proper refcount Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 18:39 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-03 20:00 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-03 18:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] proper tty-ldisc refcounting (was Re: WARNING at: drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c) Greg KH
2009-08-03 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 22:16 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-03 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 22:58 ` [PATCH 3/2] tty-ldisc: be more careful in 'put_ldisc' locking Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 23:00 ` [PATCH 4/2] tty-ldisc: make /proc/tty/ldiscs use ldisc_ops instead of ldiscs Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 23:01 ` [PATCH 5/2] tty-ldisc: get rid of tty_ldisc_try_get() helper function Linus Torvalds
2009-08-04 0:30 ` proper tty-ldisc refcounting (was Re: WARNING at: drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c) Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-04 0:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-04 3:53 ` Greg KH
2009-08-04 4:08 ` Greg KH
2009-08-04 6:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-04 7:23 ` Greg KH
2009-08-04 9:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-04 14:53 ` Greg KH
2009-08-04 15:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-04 16:00 ` Greg KH
2009-08-02 22:15 ` WARNING at: drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090802224633.GA3200@localdomain.by \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky@mail.by \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome