From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753677AbZHCVVb (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:21:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752551AbZHCVVa (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:21:30 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:38188 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752009AbZHCVVa (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:21:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:20:15 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Andrew Lutomirski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de Subject: Re: Is anyone maintaining (or even using) usbtmc? Message-ID: <20090803212015.GC28579@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 05:14:56PM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > Hi all- > > I'm trying to use usbtmc on an Aglient N9310A (The only TMC device I > have), and it sort of works, but it seems to be both extremely buggy > and missing a good deal of rather important functionality. Is there > anyone maintaining it? Yes, me. > If the answer is yes, I can describe the bugs (logspam, spurious > errors, delayed messages, inability to read status, etc.) in greater > detail. Please do, but also please use the latest version, in 2.6.30.3, we fixed some bad problems in it recently. > Is anyone using usbtmc, or, more specifically, does anyone care about > backward compatibility? What do you want to change in the driver interface? thanks, greg k-h