From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756054AbZHFQnC (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:43:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753957AbZHFQnB (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:43:01 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:40737 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753360AbZHFQnA (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:43:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:40:01 +0100 From: Russell King To: Joe Perches Cc: Ben Dooks , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, David John , Pavel Machek , Erik Mouw , kernel list , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Message-ID: <20090806164001.GA31507@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20090806125751.7d0253ce@nij0285> <20090806113104.GK31370@elf.ucw.cz> <20090806120826.GC27773@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <4A7ACC8D.7030706@xenontk.org> <20090806124048.GD27773@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1249563730.10297.13.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090806133349.GF27773@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1249568614.10297.20.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090806150322.GX2080@trinity.fluff.org> <1249575528.3467.9.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1249575528.3467.9.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:18:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 16:03 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:23:34AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 14:33 +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:02:10AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > I suspect a vger based ARM list would not require you to "run" it. > > > > There is already a vger based ARM list. I see no signs of people > > > > moving over to it. I summise that is because most people don't > > > > have a problem, and most people are happy with the existing lists > > > > as they stand. Could it be that it's only a minority who are > > > > having issues. I don't know. > > > > > > Perhaps there is too little exposure of the > > > linux-arm@vger.kernel.org mailing list. > > > > I'm not subscribed, please do not add any of the samsung entries > > with linux-arm@vger.kernel.org list. > > Perhaps this patch is more palatable. It's certainly shorter. > > It does add both linux-arm-kernel and linux-arm to section > SIMTEC EB2410ITX (BAST). By the way, another section you > maintain, SIMTEC EB110ATX (Chalice CATS), has neither a > pattern entry nor a mailing list entry. Should it? I recently had to remove those pattern entries because they were plainly wrong (thanks to those who didn't CC anyone in the ARM community with those patches.) EB110ATX != EBSA110. See ce53895. I had asked the maintainer of that platform to submit a patch to add the correct entries. Rather than having plainly bogus entries in there, let's have either nothing or the right entries. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: