From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1756075AbZHFPXP@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756075AbZHFPXP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:23:15 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755995AbZHFPXP
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:23:15 -0400
Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:60213 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755950AbZHFPXO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:23:14 -0400
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:23:54 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.31-rc5-rjw; KDE/4.3.0; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
       linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
       David John <davidjon@xenontk.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
       Erik Mouw <mouw@nl.linux.org>,
       kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20090804100051.GA17106@elf.ucw.cz> <1249568614.10297.20.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090806150322.GX2080@trinity.fluff.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090806150322.GX2080@trinity.fluff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200908061723.54825.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thursday 06 August 2009, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:23:34AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 14:33 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:02:10AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > I suspect a vger based ARM list would not require you to "run" it.
> > > There is already a vger based ARM list.  I see no signs of people
> > > moving over to it.  I summise that is because most people don't
> > > have a problem, and most people are happy with the existing lists
> > > as they stand.  Could it be that it's only a minority who are
> > > having issues.  I don't know.
> > 
> > Perhaps there is too little exposure of the
> > linux-arm@vger.kernel.org mailing list.
> 
> I'm not subscribed, please do not add any of the samsung entries
> with linux-arm@vger.kernel.org list.

Do you want to receive bug reports, though?

Rafael