From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org, rlove@google.com,
msb@google.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] vfs: explicitly cast s_maxbytes in fiemap_check_ranges
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:20:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090808072031.2c01a2aa@tlielax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090807221252.GA28019@cmpxchg.org>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 00:12:52 +0200
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:57:39PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > If fiemap_check_ranges is passed a large enough value, then it's
> > possible that the value would be cast to a signed value for comparison
> > against s_maxbytes when we change it to loff_t. Make sure that doesn't
> > happen by explicitly casting s_maxbytes to an unsigned value for the
> > purposes of comparison.
>
> I think this is unneeded, C garuantees that in this case the signed
> value will get promoted to an unsigned value, not the other way round.
>
After looking at this again, I think you're correct. do_sendfile was
actually casting s_maxbytes to a signed value which is why it was
broken there.
I can drop this patch if the consensus is to do so. I still think
however that it doesn't hurt to do explict casts when comparing signed
and unsigned values to remove any potential for ambiguity.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-08 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-07 18:57 [PATCH 0/4] vfs: change sb->s_maxbytes to loff_t Jeff Layton
2009-08-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] vfs: make get_sb_pseudo set s_maxbytes to value that can be cast to signed Jeff Layton
2009-08-07 22:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-08-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] vfs: explicitly cast s_maxbytes in fiemap_check_ranges Jeff Layton
2009-08-07 22:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-08-08 11:20 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2009-08-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] vfs: change sb->s_maxbytes to a loff_t Jeff Layton
2009-08-07 20:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-08-07 22:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-08-08 11:15 ` Jeff Layton
2009-08-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] vfs: remove redundant checks in do_sendfile Jeff Layton
2009-08-07 20:58 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-08-07 21:05 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090808072031.2c01a2aa@tlielax.poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msb@google.com \
--cc=rlove@google.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®