From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755337AbZHJDzz (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Aug 2009 23:55:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754190AbZHJDzy (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Aug 2009 23:55:54 -0400 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:48653 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752802AbZHJDzy (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Aug 2009 23:55:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:55:46 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Rusty Russell Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown Subject: Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure Message-Id: <20090810135546.2f1d079a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <200908040848.27364.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20090803133203.81174a8e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200908031422.28171.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <200908040848.27364.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__10_Aug_2009_13_55_46_+1000_4B0Na0p1JC+Jng0K" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Mon__10_Aug_2009_13_55_46_+1000_4B0Na0p1JC+Jng0K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Guys, On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:48:26 +0930 Rusty Russell wro= te: > > On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:52:27 am Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Sunday 02 August 2009 09:32:03 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Rusty, > > >=20 > > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > >=20 > > > drivers/acpi/osl.c: In function 'bind_to_cpu0': > > > drivers/acpi/osl.c:194: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_= cpus_allowed' Still getting this ... > > Here's a patch to fix this. Since Linus' tree still contains instances > > of set_cpus_allowed(), I'm guessing this patch should be added to the rr > > tree? Since set_cpus_allowed_ptr() aleeady exists in Linus' tree, you could put that patch in your tree, Bjorn. > Yep, my series removes it, at least for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=3Dy. So one of you (at least) should apply that patch to your tree! Please? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Mon__10_Aug_2009_13_55_46_+1000_4B0Na0p1JC+Jng0K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkp/mkIACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wBVACeJxJMEg5lIdSXTj4fy76iHCU6 4dgAoJc53dhprIpprjKrOjHvTLrVZClJ =g8zm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__10_Aug_2009_13_55_46_+1000_4B0Na0p1JC+Jng0K--