From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755344AbZHJD5F (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Aug 2009 23:57:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754368AbZHJD5E (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Aug 2009 23:57:04 -0400 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:48678 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754190AbZHJD5C (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Aug 2009 23:57:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:56:56 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Rusty Russell Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown Subject: Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure Message-Id: <20090810135656.193d0761.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20090810135546.2f1d079a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090803133203.81174a8e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200908031422.28171.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <200908040848.27364.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20090810135546.2f1d079a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__10_Aug_2009_13_56_56_+1000_22Eqm2U/gRh/WFFD" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Mon__10_Aug_2009_13_56_56_+1000_22Eqm2U/gRh/WFFD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:55:46 +1000 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:48:26 +0930 Rusty Russell w= rote: > > > > On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:52:27 am Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Sunday 02 August 2009 09:32:03 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi Rusty, > > > >=20 > > > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > >=20 > > > > drivers/acpi/osl.c: In function 'bind_to_cpu0': > > > > drivers/acpi/osl.c:194: error: implicit declaration of function 'se= t_cpus_allowed' >=20 > Still getting this ... >=20 > > > Here's a patch to fix this. Since Linus' tree still contains instanc= es > > > of set_cpus_allowed(), I'm guessing this patch should be added to the= rr > > > tree? >=20 > Since set_cpus_allowed_ptr() aleeady exists in Linus' tree, you could put > that patch in your tree, Bjorn. Actually "Len", sorry. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Mon__10_Aug_2009_13_56_56_+1000_22Eqm2U/gRh/WFFD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkp/mogACgkQjjKRsyhoI8zNkwCdHcsFJUQNTheCBSAoKWIWSjk4 rEwAnAvxzlTpBb4r5uSaZA9IVwiCfxfs =k702 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__10_Aug_2009_13_56_56_+1000_22Eqm2U/gRh/WFFD--