mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH]x86/RTC: introduce a new generic rtc_ops for x86
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:41:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090812134109.0913f9a9@feng-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090811084529.GB25647@elte.hu>

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:45:29 +0800
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > -#include <asm/mc146818rtc.h>
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> > -#include <linux/efi.h>
> > +struct arch_rtc_dev_ops {
> > +	unsigned long	(*get_wall_time)(void);
> > +	int		(*set_wall_time)(unsigned long);
> > +};
> > +extern struct arch_rtc_dev_ops *x86_rtc_ops;
> 
> looks like the right direction at first glance. What's the 
> management interface around the driver (there's none at the moment)? 
> Set up at early boot time and never changed afterwards?
Currently there is no management interface around it, the structure works
the way like x86_quirks, as EFI/mc146818 are kindly fixed and can't be
dynamically detected.

> 
> Have you looked at other architectures (MIPS, ARM, etc.) to see how 
> they abstracted away their RTC functionality?
I did a quick look at other architectures, and didn't see a nice abstracted
way for RTC.

In kernel early boot phase, read_persistent_clock() is called to get the HW
time, x86 implements the API by calling get_wall_time(), but just a few other
architectures implement their own read_persistent_clock() if they have rtc
devices/services that could be accessed in early boot phase, like some of
MIPS/PowerPC/s390...(ARM doesn't). So it would be difficult to ask all
architectures to use the arch_rtc_dev_ops structure.

But as kernel needs the HW time anyway, some arch/platforms implements
their rtc driver in drivers/rtc/ not in arch/.../kernel/, which will get HW
time and set it to the system time in late boot phase using late_initcall

Thanks,
Feng
> 
> 	Ingo

      reply	other threads:[~2009-08-12  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-11  7:48 Feng Tang
2009-08-11  8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-12  5:41   ` Feng Tang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090812134109.0913f9a9@feng-desktop \
    --to=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®